Impact of IPv4, IPv6 and Dual Stack Interface over Wireless Networks

Full Text (PDF, 797KB), PP.65-71

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Varsha Jain 1,* Damodar Tiwari 1 Shailendra Singh 2 Sanjeev Sharma 3

1. BIST, Bhopal

2. NITTTR, Bhopal

3. SOIT, RGPV, Bhopal

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2018.04.07

Received: 29 Oct. 2017 / Revised: 6 Dec. 2017 / Accepted: 8 Jan. 2018 / Published: 8 Apr. 2018

Index Terms

Dual Stack, Interface, IPv4, IPv6, nodes

Abstract

The entire networking society is tremendously moving towards the IPv6 addressing architecture leaving behind the IPv4 address space. This happens due to the tremendous growth of Internet usage over the networking. The government has mandated that all the devices would be IPv6 compatible as the delay in the deployment of IPv6 would result in the negative impact of future growth and global connectivity of the internet. In this paper we are dealing with the impact of different interfaces like IPv4 only, IPv6 only and Dual stack mechanism over wireless networks with varying PHY and MAC layer interface of 802.11 a/g and 802.11 b standards. The results are simulated over Qualnet 5.1 simulator with various parameters like throughput, delay, jitter and packet delivery ratio is been calculated.

Cite This Paper

Varsha Jain, Damodar Tiwari, Shailendra Singh, Sanjeev Sharma, "Impact of IPv4, IPv6 and Dual Stack Interface over Wireless Networks", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.10, No.4, pp.65-71, 2018. DOI:10.5815/ijcnis.2018.04.07

Reference

[1]M. D. Rey. California 90291. Internet Protocol, Darpa Internet Program, Protocol Specification. RFC 791. [Online]. Available: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791
[2]W. Lehr, T. Vest, and E. Lear, “Running on empty: The challenge of managing Internet addresses,” Internet Assigned Numbers Authority File Version: Internet Address TPRC 10_21_08.doc.
[3]Hurlburt, George F., Jeffrey Voas, and Keith W. Miller. "The Internet of Things: a reality check." IT Professional 14.3 (2012): 56-59.
[4]Chauhan, Dipti, and Sanjay Sharma. "A survey on next generation Internet Protocol: IPv6." Int. J. Electron. Ind. Eng. (IJEEE), ISSN 2.2 (2014): 125-128.
[5]Tsuchiya, Kazuaki, Hidemitsu Higuchi, and Yoshifumi Atarashi. Dual stack hosts using the" bump-in-the-stack" technique (BIS). No. RFC 2767. 2000.
[6]IEEE Std 802.11a–1999, "Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications: High-speed Physical Layer in the 5 GHz Band." September 16, 1999.
[7]IEEE Std 802.11b-1999, “Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications: Higher-Speed Physical Layer Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band.” September 16, 1999.
[8]Rezaei, Hadis, and Asad Vakili. "Named Data Networking: Investigate of New Infrastructure for Future of Internet." International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security 9.1 (2017): 40.
[9]Mazhelis, Oleksiy, et al. "Internet-of-things market, value networks, and business models: State of the art report." University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Computer Science and Information systems, Technical Reports TR-39 (2013).
[10]https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=ipv6-adoption&tab=ipv6-adoption.
[11]Bohlin, Erik, and Sven Lindmark. "Incentives to innovate with next generation networks." Communications and Strategies 48.4 (2002): 97-117.
[12]Chauhan, Dipti, Jay Kumar Jain, and Sanjay Sharma. "An end-to-end header compression for multihop IPv6 tunnels with varying bandwidth." Eco-friendly Computing and Communication Systems (ICECCS), 2016 Fifth International Conference on. IEEE, 2016.
[13]Chauhan, Dipti, and Sanjay Sharma. "Addressing the Bandwidth issue in End-to-End Header Compression over IPv6 tunneling Mechanism." International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security 7.9 (2015): 39.
[14]Jain, Jay Kumar, and Dipti Chauhan. "Recent Research Work on Ad-Hoc Networks: A Literature Survey.”