Zero-Moment Point-Based Biped Robot with Different Walking Patterns

Full Text (PDF, 545KB), PP.31-41

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka 1,2,* Burkhard J. Corves 2 Bram Vanderborght 3 Wen-Hong Zhu 4

1. RWTH Aachen University, Department of Mechanism and Machine Dynamics, Germany

2. Baghdad University/College of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Iraq

3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

4. Canadian Space Agency, Canada

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2015.01.03

Received: 20 May 2014 / Revised: 10 Aug. 2014 / Accepted: 4 Oct. 2014 / Published: 8 Dec. 2014

Index Terms

Biped robot, Zero-moment point, Walking pattern generators, Gait cycle, Single support phase, Double support phase

Abstract

This paper addresses three issues of motion planning for zero-moment point (ZMP)-based biped robots. First, three methods have been compared for smooth transition of biped locomotion from the single support phase (SSP) to the double support phase (DSP) and vice versa. All these methods depend on linear pendulum mode (LPM) to predict the trajectory of the center of gravity (COG) of the biped. It has been found that the three methods could give the same motion of the COG for the biped. The second issue is investigation of the foot trajectory with different walking patterns especially during the DSP. The characteristics of foot rotation can improve the stability performance with uniform configurations. Last, a simple algorithm has been proposed to compensate for ZMP deviations due to approximate model of the LPM. The results show that keeping the stance foot flat at beginning of the DSP is necessary for balancing the biped robot.

Cite This Paper

Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka, Burkhard J. Corves, Bram Vanderborght, Wen-Hong Zhu, "Zero-Moment Point-Based Biped Robot with Different Walking Patterns", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications(IJISA), vol.7, no.1, pp.31-41, 2015. DOI:10.5815/ijisa.2015.01.03

Reference

[1]M. Vukobratovic, and J. Stepanenko,” On the stability of anthropomorphic systems,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol.15, no.1-2, pp.1-73, 1972.

[2]Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka, F. Allmendinger, B. Corves, and W.-H. Zhu,” Modeling, stability and walking pattern genartors of biped robots: a review,” Robotica, FirstView Article, pp. 1-28, 2013. 

[3]Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka and B. Corves,” On the walking pattern generation of biped robot,” Journal of Automation and Control (JOACE), vol. 1, no. 2, pp.149-155, 2013.

[4]Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka, B. Corves and W.-H. Zhu,” On the dynamic optimization of biped robot,”. Lecture Notes on software Engineering, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 237-243, 2013.

[5]Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka, B. Corves, B. Vanderborght, and W.-H. Zhu,“ Finite difference-based suboptimal trajectory planning of biped robot with continuous dynamic response,” International Journal of Modeling and Optimization, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 337-343, 2013. 

[6]M. Shibuya, T. Suzuki, and K. Ohnishi,” Trajectory planning of biped robot using linear pendulum mode for double support phase,” Proc. IECON 2006-32nd Annual Conf. IEEE Industrial Electronics, pp. 4049-4099, Paris, 2006. 

[7]S. Kudoh, and T. Komura,” C2 continuous gait-pattern generation for biped robots,” IEEE/RSJ Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1135-1140. Las Vegas, Nevada, 2003.

[8]C. Zhu and A. Kawamura, “Walking principle analysis for biped robot with ZMP concept, friction constraint, and inverted pendulum mode,” In Proc. 2003 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Intelligent Robotics and systems , vol.1, pp. 364-369 2003.

[9]Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka, B. Corves, Wen-Hong Zhu, and B. Vanderborght,” Multi-level control of zero-moment point (ZMP)-based humanoid biped robots: a review,” Robotica (accepted).

[10]Hayder F. N. Al-Shuka, B. Corves, and Wen-Hong Zhu,” Dynamic modeling of biped robot using Lagrangian and recursive Newton-Euler formulations,” International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA), in press.

[11]V. Aenugu, P.-Y. Woo,” Mobile robot path planning with randomly moving obstacle and goals,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications (IJISA), Mecs, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-15, 2012.

[12]Q. Huang, S. Kajita, N. Koyachi; K. Kaneko,“ A high stability, smooth walking pattern for a biped robot,” IEEE International conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, Detroit, MI, pp.65-71, May 1999.

[13]Q. Huang; K. Yokoi, S. Kajita, K. Kaneko, H. Arai, N. Koyachi, K. Tanie,” Planning walking patterns for a biped robot,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 280 – 289, 2001.

[14]X. Mu, Q. Wu,” Synthesis of a complete sagittal cycle for a five-link biped robot,” Robotica: vol. 21, pp. 581-587, 2003.

[15]Z. Tang, C. Zhou, Z. Sun,” Trajectory planning for smooth transition for a biped robot,” IEEE International conference on Robotics and Automations, vol. 2, pp. 2455-2460, 2003.

[16]S. Kajita, S. and K. Tani,” Experimental study of biped dynamic walking,” IEEE, Control Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 13-19, 1996.

[17]B. Vanderborght, R. V. Ham, B. Verrelst, M. V. Damme, D. Lefeber,“ Overview of the Lucy project: Dynamic stabilization of a biped powered by pneumatic artificial muscles,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1027-1051, 2008.

[18]Y. Guan, K. Yokoi, O. Stasse, A. Kheddar,” On robotic trajectory planning using polynomial interpolations,” In Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics and Biomimetics, pp. 111-116, 2005. 

[19]L. Wang, Z. Yu, F. He, Y. Jiao,” Research on biped robot gait in double-support phase,” IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 1553-1558, 2007.

[20]C. -L. Shih,” Gait synthesis for a biped robot,” Robotica: vol. 15, pp.599-607, 1997.