Linked Data: A Framework for Publishing Five-Star Open Government Data

Full Text (PDF, 670KB), PP.1-15

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Bassel Al-khatib 1,2,* Ali Ahmad Ali 3

1. Syrian Virtual University, Damascus, Syria

2. Al-Sham Private University, Damascus, Syria

3. Syrian Virtual University, Syria

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2021.06.01

Received: 3 Jul. 2021 / Revised: 21 Aug. 2021 / Accepted: 6 Oct. 2021 / Published: 8 Dec. 2021

Index Terms

Semantic web, linked data, open data, open government, open government data, linked open data, linked open government data

Abstract

With the increased adoption of open government initiatives around the world, a huge amount of governmental raw datasets was released. However, the data was published in heterogeneous formats and vocabularies and in many cases in bad quality due to inconsistency, messy, and maybe incorrectness as it has been collected by practicalities within the source organization, which makes it inefficient for reusing and integrating it for serving citizens and third-party apps.
This research introduces the LDOG (Linked Data for Open Government) experimental framework, which aims to provide a modular architecture that can be integrated into the open government hierarchy, allowing huge amounts of data to be gathered in a fine-grained manner from source and directly publishing them as linked data based on Tim Berners lee’s five-star deployment scheme with a validation layer using SHACL, which results in high quality data.
The general idea is to model the hierarchy of government and classify government organizations into two types, the modeling organizations at higher levels and data source organizations at lower levels. Modeling organization’s experts in linked data have the responsibility to design data templates, ontologies, SHACL shapes, and linkage specifications. whereas non-experts can be incorporated in data source organizations to utilize their knowledge in data to do mapping, reconciliation, and correcting data. This approach lowers the needed experts that represent a problem of linked data adoption.
To test the functionality of our framework in action, we developed the LDOG platform which utilizes the different modules of the framework to power a set of user interfaces that can be used to publish government datasets. we used this platform to convert some of UAE's government datasets into linked data. Finally, on top of the converted data, we built a proof-of-concept app to show the power of five-star linked data for integrating datasets from disparate organizations and to promote the governments' adoption. Our work has defined a clear path to integrate the linked data into open governments and solid steps to publishing and enhancing it in a fine-grained and practical manner with a lower number of experts in linked data, It extends SHACL to define data shapes and convert CSV to RDF.

Cite This Paper

Bassel Al-khatib, Ali Ahmad Ali, "Linked Data: A Framework for Publishing Five-Star Open Government Data", International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science(IJITCS), Vol.13, No.6, pp.1-15, 2021. DOI:10.5815/ijitcs.2021.06.01

Reference

[1]L. C. B. Martins, M. C. Victorino, M. Holanda, G. Ghinea, and T.-M. Grønli, “UnBGOLD: UnB Government Open Linked Data: Semantic Enrichment of Open Data Tool,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems - MEDES ’18, 2018, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1145/3281375.3281394.
[2]L. Ding et al., “TWC LOGD: A portal for linked open government data ecosystems,” J. Web Semant., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 325–333, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2011.06.002.
[3]F. Maali, R. Cyganiak, and V. Peristeras, “A Publishing Pipeline for Linked Government Data,” in The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. ESWC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7295 LNCS, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 778–792.
[4]L. Selmi and N. Alessia, “Fusepool P3: A Linked Data Platform for Open Government Data,” Electron. Gov. Electron. Particip. Jt. Proc. Ongoing Res. Proj. IFIP WG 8.5 EGOV ePart 2015, pp. 101–108, 2015, doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-570-8-101.
[5]A. Vetrò, L. Canova, M. Torchiano, C. O. Minotas, R. Iemma, and F. Morando, “Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 325–337, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001.
[6]B. Todesco, B. Blume, A. Zancanaro, J. L. Todesco, and F. Gauthier, “Linked open government data research panorama,” IC3K 2013; KEOD 2013 - 5th Int. Conf. Knowl. Eng. Ontol. Dev. Proc., pp. 278–285, 2013, doi: 10.5220/0004548402780285.
[7]F. Scharffe et al., “Enabling Linked Data Publication with the Datalift Platform,” Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. - Work. Semant. Cities, vol. WS-12-13, 2012.
[8]Afnan M. AlSukhayri, Muhammad Ahtisham Aslam, Sachi Arafat, Naif Radi Aljohani, "Leveraging the Saudi Linked Open Government Data: A Framework and Potential Benefits", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.11, No.7, pp. 14-22, 2019.DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2019.07.02
[9]A. L. Machado and J. M. Parente de Oliveira, “DIGO: An Open Data Architecture for e-Government,” in 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, 2011, pp. 448–456, doi: 10.1109/EDOCW.2011.34.
[10]P. Milić, N. Veljković, and L. Stoimenov, Smart Technologies for Smart Governments, vol. 24, no. July. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
[11]B. W. Wirtz and S. Birkmeyer, “Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 381–396, 2015, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2014.942735.
[12]A. Corradi, L. Foschini, and R. Ianniello, “Linked data for Open Government: The case of Bologna,” in 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2014, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/ISCC.2014.6912473.
[13]OKF, “The Open Definition - Open Definition - Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge,” Opendefinition.org. [Online]. Available: http://opendefinition.org/. [Accessed: 13-Feb-2021].
[14]M. Kaschesky and L. Selmi, “Fusepool R5 linked data framework,” in Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2013, pp. 156–165, doi: 10.1145/2479724.2479748.
[15]B. S. Hitz-Gamper, O. Neumann, and M. Stürmer, “Balancing control, usability and visibility of linked open government data to create public value,” Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 457–472, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-02-2018-0062.
[16]B. Tim Berners-lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, “The Semantic Web A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities,” Sci. Am., vol. 284, pp. 34–43, 2001.
[17]T. Heath and C. Bizer, “Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space,” Synth. Lect. Semant. Web Theory Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–136, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.2200/S00334ED1V01Y201102WBE001.
[18]“Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL).” [Online]. Available: https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/. [Accessed: 28-Feb-2021].
[19] “Linked Data - Design Issues.” [Online]. Available: https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html. [Accessed: 03-Jul-2020].
[20]B. Ell, D. Vrandečić, and E. Simperl, “Labels in the web of data,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2011, vol. 7031 LNCS, no. PART 1, pp. 162–176, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_11.