Analyzing Students’ Performance Using Fuzzy Logic and Hierarchical Linear Regression

Full Text (PDF, 889KB), PP.1-10

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Dao Thi Thanh Loan 1 Nguyen Duy Tho 2 Nguyen Huu Nghia 3 Vu Dinh Chien 4 Tran Anh Tuan 5,6,*

1. Faculty of Foundational Sciences, Dak Lak College of Pedagogy, Dak Lak, 63000, Vietnam

2. University of Foreign Language Studies, The University Of Da Nang, Da Nang, 50000, Vietnam

3. Quang Binh Medical College, Quang Binh, 47100, Vietnam

4. Dak Lak College of Pedagogy, Dak Lak, 63000, Vietnam

5. School of Informatics, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80160, Thailand

6. Informatics Innovation Center of Excellence (IICE), Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80160, Thailand

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2024.01.01

Received: 16 Aug. 2023 / Revised: 13 Oct. 2023 / Accepted: 31 Dec. 2023 / Published: 8 Feb. 2024

Index Terms

Students' performance, fuzzy grades, fuzzy logic, linear regression, hierarchical linear regression, hybrid approach

Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 situation, all activities, including education, were shifted to online platforms. Consequently, instructors encountered increased challenges in evaluating students. In traditional assessment methods, instructors often face ambiguous cases when evaluating students’ competencies. Recent research has focused on the effectiveness of fuzzy logic in assessing students’ competencies, considering the presence of uncertain factors or multiple variables. Additionally, demographic characteristics, which can potentially influence students’ performance, are not typically utilized as inputs in the fuzzy logic method. Therefore, analyzing students’ performance by incorporating these factors is crucial in suggesting adjustments to teaching and learning strategies. In this study, we employ a combination of fuzzy logic and hierarchical linear regression to analyze students’ performance. The experiment involved 318 students from various programs and showed that the hybrid approach assessed students’ performance with greater nuance and adaptability when compared to a traditional method. Moreover, the findings in this study revealed the following: 1) There are differences in students’ performance between traditional and fuzzy evaluation methods; 2) The learning method is an impact on students’ fuzzy grades; 3) Students studying online do not perform better than those studying onsite. These findings suggest that instructors and educators should explore effective strategies being fair and suitable in assessment and learning.

Cite This Paper

Dao Thi Thanh Loan, Nguyen Duy Tho, Nguyen Huu Nghia, Vu Dinh Chien, Tran Anh Tuan, "Analyzing Students’ Performance Using Fuzzy Logic and Hierarchical Linear Regression", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.16, No.1, pp. 1-10, 2024. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2024.01.01

Reference

[1]L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.
[2]R. Sripan and B. Suksawat, “Propose of fuzzy logic-based students’ learning assessment,” in ICCAS 2010, 2010, pp. 414–417.
[3]V. Ivanova and B. Zlatanov, “Implementation of fuzzy functions aimed at fairer grading of students’ tests,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 9, no. 3, p. 214, 2019.
[4]R. S. Yadav, A. K. Soni, and S. Pal, “A study of academic performance evaluation using Fuzzy Logic techniques,” in 2014 International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 2014, pp. 48–53.
[5]N. A. Namli and O. Şenkal, “Using the fuzzy logic in assessing the programming performance of students,” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 701–712, 2018.
[6]K. Chrysafiadi, C. Troussas, and M. Virvou, “Combination of fuzzy and cognitive theories for adaptive e-assessment,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 161, p. 113614, 2020.
[7]S. Wen and D. Liu, “Students’ Learning Performance Evaluation Using a New Fuzzy Inference System,” in 2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE), 2021, pp. 650–656.
[8]N. A. Bakar, S. Rosbi, and A. A. Bakar, “Evaluation of Students Performance using Fuzzy Set Theory in Online Learning of Islamic Finance Course.,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 202–209, 2021.
[9]J. Stańdo, I. Mokwa-Tarnowska, and M. Roszak, “Analysis of Learning Outcomes in Medical Education with the Use of Fuzzy Logic,” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 609–616, 2021.
[10]T. Petra and M. J. A. Aziz, “Analysing Student Performance In Higher Education Using Fuzzy Logic Evaluation,” International Journal of Scintific and Technology Research, vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 322–327, 2021.
[11]T. A. Ajoi, S. S. Gran, A. Kanyan, and S. F. Lajim, “An enhanced systematic student performance evaluation based on fuzzy logic approach for selection of best student award,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 10–20, 2021.
[12]D. Doz, D. Felda, and M. Cotič, “Combining Students’ Grades and Achievements on the National Assessment of Knowledge: A Fuzzy Logic Approach,” Axioms, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 359, 2022.
[13]B. E. in Özseven and N. Cagman, “A Novel Student Performance Evaluation Model Based on Fuzzy Logic for Distance Learning,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2022.
[14]S. Saliu, “Constrained subjective assessment of student learning,” J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 271–284, 2005.
[15]N. Arora and J. R. Saini, “A fuzzy probabilistic neural network for student’s academic performance prediction,” Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 4425–4432, 2013.
[16]J. P. Marini, E. J. Shaw, L. Young, and M. Ewing, “Getting to Know Your Criterion: Examining College Course Grades and GPAs over Time.,” College Board, 2018.
[17]V. Ivanova and B. Zlatanov, “Application of fuzzy logic in online test evaluation in English as a foreign language at university level,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2019, p. 40009.
[18]D. N. Yoliadi, “Analysis of Student Academic Achievement Levels using Fuzzy Logic,” Jurnal Indonesia: Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 373–390, 2023.
[19]R. Thinakaran, S. Chupra, and M. Batumalay, “Motivation assessment model for intelligent tutoring system based on mamdani inference system,” IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 189, 2023.
[20]E. H. Özberk, K. Atalay Kabasakal, and N. I. Boztunç Öztürk, “Investigating the factors affecting Turkish students’ PISA 2012 mathematics achievement using hierarchical linear modeling,” 2017.
[21]S.-P. Chien and H.-K. Wu, “Examining influences of science teachers’ practices and beliefs about technology-based assessment on students’ performances: A hierarchical linear modeling approach,” Comput Educ, vol. 157, p. 103986, 2020.
[22]L. Hsu and Y.-J. Chen, “Hierarchical linear modeling to explore contextual effects on EFL teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK): the Taiwanese case,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023.
[23]M. Wang, R. Yu, and J. Hu, “The relationship between social media-related factors and student collaborative problem-solving achievement: an HLM analysis of 37 countries,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), pp. 1–19, 2023.
[24]M.-K. Chen, H.-N. Chien, and R.-L. Liu, “An Empirical Study on the Learning Experiences and Outcomes of College Student Club Committee Members Using a Linear Hierarchical Regression Model,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 23, 2023.
[25]E. Cox, “Fuzzy fundamentals,” IEEE Spectr, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 58–61, 1992.
[26]R, “R programming language.” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.r-project.org/
[27]Jamovi-Project, “Jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer Software].” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.jamovi.org
[28]L. M. Sullivan, K. A. Dukes, and E. Losina, “An introduction to hierarchical linear modelling,” Stat Med, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 855–888, 1999.
[29]Matlab-online, “Matlab online.” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://matlab.mathworks.com/