Manel Baba-Ahmed

Mobility Aware Strategy for Geographical Routing Schemes in Underwater Acoustic Networks

Full Text (PDF, 875KB), PP.33-53

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Manel Baba-Ahmed ^1,*

1. Department of Computer Science, University of Djillali Liabes, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijwmt.2022.03.03

Received: 26 Feb. 2022 / Revised: 24 Mar. 2022 / Accepted: 12 Apr. 2022 / Published: 8 Jun. 2022

Index Terms

Underwater Wireless Sensor Network, Mobility prediction, Recover algorithm, MAGR-VBF.

Abstract

In those last decades the Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSNs) have become the commonly explored technology by the scientific community, for the numerous benefits that it can brings to the researchers, however the frequent movement of the underwater sensors due to their mobility or water current factor may severally affect the efficiency of the acoustic wireless communication and reduce it performance. In this paper a Mobility Aware Strategy for Geographical Routing scheme (MAGR-VBF) has been proposed for an early prevention from the mobile sensor during the packet transmission, the protocol is aimed to predict the mobility and switch to another candidate sensor enable to recover the data packet in order to mitigate the packet loss problem. Based on the well-known routing protocol for the UWSNs ‘Vector Based Forwarding’ (VBF) the proposed study has been implemented and designed using the NS-2 simulator and Aqua-Sim. The result has shown that the presented work (MAGR-VBF) has brings a good performance over the basic VBF, where the energy consumption and the average end to end delay have been reduced by 8.97 % and 5.55 % respectively, and an average of 6.16 % has been increased of packet delivery ratio metric.

Cite This Paper

Manel Baba-Ahmed, " Mobility Aware Strategy for Geographical Routing Schemes in Underwater Acoustic Networks", International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies(IJWMT), Vol.12, No.3, pp. 33-53, 2022. DOI: 10.5815/ijwmt.2022.03.03

Reference

[1]Hussain, T., Rehman, Z. U., Iqbal, A., Saeed, K., & Ali, I. (2020). Two hop verification for avoiding void hole in underwater wireless sensor network using SM‐AHH‐VBF and AVH‐AHH‐VBF routing protocols. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 31(8), e3992.

[2]Ganesh, N. (2020). Performance evaluation of depth adjustment and void aware pressure routing (DA-VAPR) protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. The Computer Journal, 63(2), 193-202.

[3]Chaaf, A., Saleh Ali Muthanna, M., Muthanna, A., Alhelaly, S., Elgendy, I. A., Iliyasu, A. M., ... & Ahmed, A. (2021). Energy-Efficient Relay-Based Void Hole Prevention and Repair in Clustered Multi-AUV Underwater Wireless Sensor Network. Security and Communication Networks, 2021.

[4]Das, A. P., & Thampi, S. M. (2017). Fault-resilient localization for underwater sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 55, 132-142.

[5]Yan, H., Shi, Z. J., & Cui, J. H. (2008, May). DBR: depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In International conference on research in networking (pp. 72-86). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[6]Bhambri, H., & Swaroop, A. (2014, March). Underwater sensor network: Architectures, challenges and applications. In 2014 International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) (pp. 915-920). IEEE.

[7]Jouhari, M., Ibrahimi, K., Tembine, H., & Ben-Othman, J. (2019). Underwater wireless sensor networks: A survey on enabling technologies, localization protocols, and internet of underwater things. IEEE Access, 7, 96879-96899.

[8]Goyal, N., Dave, M., & Verma, A. K. (2018). A novel fault detection and recovery technique for cluster‐based underwater wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 31(4), e3485.

[9]Beniwal, M., & Singh, R. (2014). Localization techniques and their challenges in underwater wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol, 5(3), 4706-4710.

[10]Tan, H. P., Diamant, R., Seah, W. K., & Waldmeyer, M. (2011). A survey of techniques and challenges in underwater localization. Ocean Engineering, 38(14-15), 1663-1676.

[11]Gao, B., Zhang, L., Chu, D., Jin, J., & Liu, L. (2016, April). A novel mobility aware medium access control protocol for underwater sensor networks. In OCEANS 2016-Shanghai (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[12]Agarwal, K., & Rakesh, N. (2017). Node mobility issues in underwater wireless sensor network. In Advances in Computer and Computational Sciences (pp. 293-303). Springer, Singapore.

[13]ARSHAD, M. A. A. (2011). EFFICIENT DYNAMIC ADDRESSING BASED ROUTING FOR UNDERWATER WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS).

[14]Tayyab, M., Abdullah, A. H. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2019). Mobility-aware IMU-based Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSN. Universal Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 6(4), 291-302.

[15]Sani, U., & Mohamad, M. M. (2020). Green-Centric Communication Void Avoidance for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(3), 745-759.

[16]Kumari, S., Mishra, P. K., & Anand, V. (2020). Fault resilient routing based on moth flame optimization scheme for underwater wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 26(2), 1417-1431.

[17]Hafeez, T., Javaid, N., Hameed, A. R., Sher, A., Khan, Z. A., & Qasim, U. (2016, July). AVN-AHH-VBF: Avoiding void node with adaptive hop-by-hop vector-based forwarding for underwater wireless sensor networks. In 2016 10th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS) (pp. 49-56). IEEE.

[18]Draz, U., Ali, T., Yasin, S., Waqas, U., & Rafiq, U. (2019, February). Towards Formalism of Link Failure Detection Algorithm for Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks. In 2019 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[19]Xie, P., Cui, J. H., & Lao, L. (2006, May). VBF: Vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks. In International conference on research in networking (pp. 1216-1221). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[20]Abbas, C. J. B., Montandon, R., Orozco, A. L. S., & Villalba, L. J. G. (2019). EBVBF: energy balanced vector based forwarding protocol. IEEE Access, 7, 54273-54284.

[21]Nicolaou, N., See, A., Xie, P., Cui, J. H., & Maggiorini, D. (2007, June). Improving the robustness of location-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In Oceans 2007-Europe (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[22]Yu, H., Yao, N., & Liu, J. (2015). An adaptive routing protocol in underwater sparse acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 34, 121-143.

[23]Ali, T., Jung, L. T., & Faye, I. (2014). Classification of routing algorithms in volatile environment of underwater wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 6(2), 129.

[24]Khalid, M., Ullah, Z., Ahmad, N., Arshad, M., Jan, B., Cao, Y., & Adnan, A. (2017). A survey of routing issues and associated protocols in underwater wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 2017.

[25]Ghoreyshi, S. M., Shahrabi, A., & Boutaleb, T. (2015, August). An inherently void avoidance routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. In 2015 International Symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS) (pp. 361-365). IEEE.

[26]Sofiane, B. H., Abdelkader, O., & Asmaa, B. (2014). Predictive preemptive certificate transfer in cluster-based certificate chain. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 6(1), 44.

[27]Ahmed, M. B., Cherif, M. A., & Hacene, S. B. (2021). A Cross-Layer Predictive and Preemptive Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Using the Lagrange Interpolation. International Journal of Wireless Networks and Broadband Technologies (IJWNBT), 10(2), 78-99.

[28]Xie, P., Zhou, Z., Peng, Z., Yan, H., Hu, T., Cui, J. H., ... & Zhou, S. (2009, October). Aqua-Sim: An NS-2 based simulator for underwater sensor networks. In OCEANS 2009 (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

[29]Dong, M., Li, H., Yin, R., Qin, Y., & Hu, Y. (2021). Scalable asynchronous localization algorithm with mobility prediction for underwater wireless sensor networks. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 143, 110588.

[30]Alqahtani, G. J., & Bouabdallah, F. (2021). Energy Efficient Mobility Prediction Routing Protocol for freely floating underwater acoustic sensors networks. Frontiers in Communications and Networks, 2, 25.

[31]Verma, S. (2015). Communication Architecture for Underwater Wireless Sensor Network. International Journal of Computer Network & Information Security, 7(6).

[32]Verma, S. (2015). A cluster based key management scheme for underwater wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 7(9), 54.

[33]Gola, K. K., & Gupta, B. (2018). Underwater Sensor Networks: An Efficient Node Deployment Technique for Enhancing Coverage and Connectivity: END-ECC. International Journal of Computer Network & Information Security, 10(12).

International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies (IJWMT)