International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies (IJWMT)
IJWMT Vol. 13, No. 4, 8 Aug. 2023
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 314KB)
IPv6 Migration Strategy Using Carrier Grade Network Address Translation
Full Text (PDF, 314KB), PP.11-17
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Dipti Chauhan
1,*
Index Terms
CPE, NAT, NAT44, NAT64, NAT444, CGNAT
Abstract
Due to the increased strain each new Internet-connected item puts on the IPv4 infrastructure, the emergence of additional Internet-connected places and devices has accelerated IPv4 exhaustion. Service providers have been obliged to invest in infrastructure to handle greater traffic due to unexpected growth in subscribers and linked IoT devices. Service providers are struggling to maintain growth and business continuity due to the expiration of IPv4 globally and the adoption of IPv6. There is strongly a need to address both a short-term solution for the maintenance of their current IPv4 address allocation and a long-term solution for a seamless transition to an IPv6 infrastructure, various service providers will need to design an address translation strategy. This paper presents a solution using CGNAT towards the migration of IPv6 networks. A general overview of the various parts needed to manage the depletion of IPv4 addressing and the engagement of full carrier grade network address translation solution is also discussed in this paper along with the different types of NAT.
Cite This Paper
Dipti Chauhan, "IPv6 Migration Strategy Using Carrier Grade Network Address Translation", International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies(IJWMT), Vol.13, No.4, pp. 11-17, 2023. DOI:10.5815/ijwmt.2023.04.02
Reference
[1]Chauhan, D., & Sharma, S. (2014). A survey on next generation Internet Protocol: IPv6. Int. J. Electron. Ind. Eng.(IJEEE), ISSN, 2(2), 125-128.
[2]Al-hamadani, A. T. H., & Lencse, G. (2021). A survey on the performance analysis of IPv6 transition technologies. Acta Technica Jaurinensis, 14(2), 186-211.
[3]Dawadi, B. R., Rawat, D. B., Joshi, S. R., & Manzoni, P. (2022). Towards Smart Networking with SDN Enabled IPv6 Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01528.
[4]Hinden, R., & Deering, S. (2003). Internet protocol version 6 (IPv6) addressing architecture (No. rfc3513).
[5]Kivinen, Tero, et al. Negotiation of NAT-Traversal in the IKE. No. rfc3947. 2005.
[6]Dawadi, B. R., Rawat, D. B., Joshi, S. R., & Manzoni, P. (2022). Towards Smart Networking with SDN Enabled IPv6 Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01528.
[7]Radu, R., & Hausding, M. (2020). Consolidation in the DNS resolver market–how much, how fast, how dangerous?. Journal of Cyber Policy, 5(1), 46-64.
[8]Marian, C. V. (2021, May). DNS Records Secure Provisioning Mechanism for Virtual Machines automatic management in high density data centers. In 2021 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[9]Fukuda, K., Aharen, Y., Sato, S., & Mitamura, T. (2022, April). Characterizing DNS query response sizes through active and passive measurements. In NOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[10]Chauhan, D., Jain, J. K., & Sharma, S. (2016, December). An end-to-end header compression for multihop IPv6 tunnels with varying bandwidth. In 2016 Fifth international conference on eco-friendly computing and communication systems (ICECCS) (pp. 84-88). IEEE.
[11]Nam, T. S., Van Thuc, H., & Van Long, N. A High-Throughput Hardware Implementation of NAT Traversal for IPSEC VPN.
[12]Chauhan, D., & Sharma, S. (2015). Addressing the Bandwidth issue in End-to-End Header Compression over IPv6 tunneling Mechanism. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 7(9), 39-45.
[13]Chauhan, D., Jain, J. K., & Bahad, P. (2021). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF 802.11 A/G WIRELESS NETWORKS WITH IP6HC. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24, 1-7.